**Brad Pitt Gains Legal Momentum in $500 Million Winery Dispute with Angelina Jolie**

In an ongoing and highly publicized legal battle over a French winery, Hollywood star Brad Pitt appears to be gaining the upper hand against his ex-wife, Angelina Jolie.
A judge has shown a tendency to support Pitt’s request to review non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) that Jolie had signed, potentially tipping the scales in his favor.

When Angelina Jolie Admitted To Fearing For Her Children's Safety, Years After Her Split From Brad Pitt: “It Took A Lot For Me...”

### The Chateau Miraval Winery Dispute

The dispute centers around Chateau Miraval, a sprawling and picturesque estate in southern France, renowned for producing world-class rosé wines.

Pitt and Jolie purchased the estate in 2008, investing considerable effort into developing it into a prestigious wine brand. However, their relationship deteriorated, leading to a separation and subsequent legal battles over their shared assets, with the winery becoming the focal point of their dispute.

### The Sale Controversy

The controversy began when Jolie sold her share of the winery to a company owned by a Russian oligarch without Pitt’s consent.

Pitt filed a lawsuit in 2021, accusing Jolie of breaching their mutual agreement, which stipulated that neither party would sell their shares without the other’s approval. According to Pitt, this clause was crucial to ensure the joint management and sustained value of the winery.

### Judge’s Inclination and Legal Arguments

In a recent court hearing in Los Angeles, Pitt’s legal team emphasized the importance of reviewing the NDAs signed by Jolie. They argue that these documents could provide critical evidence supporting Pitt’s claims and refuting Jolie’s actions.

The presiding judge, Leah Martin, seemed persuaded by Pitt’s arguments, indicating a tendency to approve his request. If these NDAs are found to be legally binding, Jolie’s sale of her shares could be deemed a breach of contract.

### Jolie’s Defense and Counterclaims

On her part, Jolie maintains that she had the legal right to sell her shares and that her actions were above board. She has filed a counterclaim, arguing that no violation occurred.

Jolie’s legal team contends that Pitt is using the NDAs as a tactic to obscure instances of domestic abuse that she and their children allegedly endured. According to Jolie, Pitt attempted to use an NDA as a condition for purchasing her share of the winery, a condition she refused to accept.

### The Broader Implications

The legal battle between Pitt and Jolie is not just about property and assets; it reflects the deep and complex conflicts stemming from their broken marriage. Jolie’s legal team argues that the NDAs were signed to protect personal information and should not be disclosed due to the current dispute.

They claim that Pitt is attempting to leverage these agreements against Jolie, potentially revealing sensitive information and invading the privacy of third parties involved.

### Psychological Impact on Children

Amidst this intense legal battle, the psychological impact on their children cannot be ignored. Divorce and family conflicts can leave lasting impressions on children, affecting their behavior and psychological well-being throughout their lives.

Witnessing their parents’ legal and emotional battles can create deeply rooted emotions that extend beyond childhood, influencing their future relationships and perspectives on marriage.

### A Complex Legal Saga

As the legal proceedings continue, the situation remains fluid and complex. Pitt’s legal team’s recent successes in court suggest a potential advantage, but many unforeseen developments could still occur.

The judge’s anticipated ruling to review the NDAs signed by Jolie could provide pivotal evidence, yet Jolie’s team is vigorously opposing this move, arguing it could cause significant harm and misunderstandings.

### Public and Media Attention

The high-profile nature of the case has attracted widespread public and media attention. Both Pitt and Jolie are globally recognized figures, and their legal battle over Chateau Miraval has become a subject of intense scrutiny and speculation.

The outcome of this dispute will undoubtedly have significant implications for both parties, potentially impacting their professional reputations and personal lives.

### Conclusion

The legal battle over Chateau Miraval is more than just a property dispute; it is a reflection of the broader and more profound conflicts between Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie. As the case unfolds, with the judge leaning towards supporting Pitt’s requests, the situation appears to be in his favor.

However, Jolie’s legal team continues to fight back, highlighting the complexity and intensity of this high-stakes legal saga. Regardless of the outcome, the dispute over this $500 million winery is sure to be talked about for a long time, offering insights into the challenges of managing shared assets and personal conflicts in the public eye.