In the world of political communication, a press secretary’s job is to craft a narrative, to shape the public’s understanding of a president’s actions and motives. They are the gatekeepers of a carefully curated message, tasked with presenting a polished, powerful image to the world. But every so often, a single, unscripted moment—a hot mic gaffe, a rogue tweet, a moment of raw honesty—can dismantle that narrative in an instant. This is precisely what happened when White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt’s carefully constructed praise for President Trump was utterly shredded by a single, perfectly timed tweet from Fox News co-host Jessica Tarlov.

The saga began on a seemingly ordinary Tuesday, when Leavitt stood at the White House lectern and declared to reporters that Donald Trump was “the peace president,” a global leader whose foreign policy was bringing a resolution to conflicts that had long been stalemated. She spoke with a tone of unwavering conviction, insisting that “American leadership is back on the world stage” and that Trump had “firmly restored America’s status as the undisputed leader of the free world.” She painted a picture of a president who, unlike his predecessors, was a powerful, no-nonsense negotiator who could bring warring parties to the table and broker a lasting peace. She even highlighted the upcoming conflict resolution negotiations between European leaders, including Russia’s Vladimir Putin and Ukraine’s Volodymyr Zelensky, as a testament to Trump’s masterful diplomacy.
For all intents and purposes, it was a routine press briefing. Leavitt, who has a reputation for her combative style, was delivering a message that was entirely in line with the administration’s public persona. The foreign policy establishment, she said, was a failure whose record was nothing but “endless wars, trillions of wasted taxpayer dollars and dead Americans.” She said that they had the “nerve to try and lecture President Trump, who has solved seven global conflicts in seven months, about peace.” It was a powerful narrative designed to both attack his opponents and elevate the president as a global peacemaker.
But then, the next day, Jessica Tarlov—the lone liberal voice on The Five—stepped in to play the role of the ultimate narrative disrupter. Taking to her X account, she fired off a single, stinging tweet that exposed the hypocrisy at the heart of Leavitt’s entire speech. “I’m sure next to standing up for America in the dictionary it reads, ‘Putin wants to make a deal for me.’” With one line, she completely undermined Leavitt’s carefully constructed image of a selfless, peace-loving president, and she did it by using the president’s own words.
Tarlov’s tweet was a direct reference to a moment that had gone viral just days earlier. The president had been caught on a hot mic, whispering to French President Emmanuel Macron. As the two men stood side-by-side, Trump was overheard saying, “I think he wants to make a deal for me. Do you understand that? As crazy as it sounds.” It was a private, unscripted moment that revealed a very different motivation for the president’s “peacemaking” efforts. It wasn’t about global stability or American leadership; it was about a personal victory, a deal that would be “for me.”
This unscripted truth served as the perfect counterpoint to Leavitt’s polished narrative. While she was busy claiming Trump was a global leader, his own words revealed a deeply self-serving motivation. Tarlov, a political strategist for the Democrats, understood this dynamic perfectly. Her role on The Five is to provide a counterbalance to the conservative opinions of her co-hosts, and she has become an expert at pointing out the contradictions within the Trump administration’s rhetoric. In a world where political debates are often about who can shout the loudest, Tarlov’s approach is often more subtle and, in this case, far more effective.
The incident is also a fascinating look at the new rules of political communication in the digital age. A single tweet from a well-known media personality can reach just as many people—and have just as much impact—as a televised press briefing. It can cut through the noise and expose a narrative for what it really is: a performance. Leavitt’s words were carefully crafted to praise the president, but Tarlov’s one line of commentary was an act of pure, unadulterated trolling. It was a verbal gut-punch that left Leavitt’s narrative looking defensive and hollow.
Of course, this isn’t the first time Leavitt’s professional choices have been scrutinized. She has, on other occasions, made headlines for her combative interactions with reporters and for being photographed in a gold armchair typically reserved for heads of state—a move that was widely seen as an attempt to project an image of power and importance. Her claim that the media is “actively rooting” against Trump’s peacemaking efforts is a familiar refrain, one that seeks to deflect criticism and paint the press as an enemy of the people. But it’s a strategy that can’t withstand the light of the truth, especially when that truth comes from the president’s own lips.

Leavitt’s narrative of a peacemaking president is further complicated by Trump’s own words, as revealed by a source. When asked about his efforts, Trump told The Mark Levin Show that he wanted to see what would happen if Putin and Zelensky met without him. “If necessary, and it probably would be, but if necessary, I’ll go and I’ll probably be able to get it closed.” This confirms the narrative that Trump is not just an intermediary but a key player in the negotiations, one who can “get it closed.” However, in the context of his “hot mic moment,” it paints a picture of a president whose motives are as much about personal glory as they are about global peace.
For Jessica Tarlov, this wasn’t just a simple disagreement with a political opponent; it was a showdown about integrity. It was an opportunity to show the public that what is said at the podium is often a carefully constructed performance, and that the real story is often found in the unscripted, unguarded moments. While Leavitt and the Trump administration may continue to push their narrative of a “peace president,” Tarlov’s simple, powerful tweet is a reminder that in the age of hot mics and viral content, the truth has a way of finding a microphone of its own.