Megyn Kelly Hits Back at Blake Lively, Claims Victory in Subpoena Showdown

A New Front Opens in a High-Profile Hollywood War

The already contentious Justin Baldoni legal battle has spiraled into a multi-front war, pulling one of the media’s most formidable figures, Megyn Kelly, directly into the line of fire. In a blistering segment on her podcast, Kelly alleged that actress Blake Lively targeted her with a subpoena in a stunning attempt to seize confidential materials related to her show’s coverage of Lively’s dispute with her “It Ends With Us” co-star. The accusation has ignited a fierce debate, pitting a Hollywood heavyweight against a media titan in a clash that extends beyond the courtroom and into the realm of journalistic ethics and freedom of the press. Kelly’s declaration of victory in this alleged legal skirmish has introduced a volatile new narrative into the saga. The dramatic claim surrounding the Megyn Kelly Blake Lively subpoena now threatens to overshadow the original lawsuit, creating a public spectacle of power, reputation, and accusation.

Kelly’s On-Air Broadside: “She Has Zero Right”

Megyn Kelly dedicated a significant portion of her show to what she described as a direct assault on her journalistic integrity. She claimed Lively’s legal team demanded access to a vast array of her show’s internal records. “She actually tried to get the confidential and proprietary materials my team and I used for any and all stories about her,” Kelly told her listeners, her voice laced with incredulity and defiance.

Kelly posited that the move was born from Lively’s “narcissistic” belief that any negative press must be the result of a conspiracy. The podcaster explained that because she and Justin Baldoni happen to share the same attorney, Bryan Freedman, Lively’s team jumped to a conclusion. “She posited that I must have been ensnared in Baldoni’s alleged ongoing ‘smear campaign’ against her,” Kelly said. “She suggested that I was getting paid by Baldoni or Freedman for my anti-Blake coverage.” Kelly passionately refuted this, delivering a pointed message directly to the actress: “Newsflash, Blake: I came to those conclusions totally organically. Don’t give your power away, sweetheart – it was you, all you, who made me unable to stand you.”

The climax of her monologue was a declaration of total victory. “We fought her subpoena and won,” she announced. “We gave her absolutely nothing. Not one document, not one record, not one communication… She has zero right to nose around in how I gather news.”

The Original Sin: The Lively vs. Baldoni Lawsuit

This new conflict cannot be understood without examining the original celebrity lawsuit at its heart. The dispute erupted in late 2024 when Blake Lively filed a sexual harassment complaint against Justin Baldoni, her director and co-star in the film “It Ends With Us.” The allegations, which Baldoni has consistently denied, claimed he caused her “severe emotional distress” during the production.

Baldoni responded with a massive $400 million defamation countersuit, arguing that Lively’s claims were false and maliciously intended to destroy his career. The legal fight became increasingly acrimonious, with both sides filing motions and trading accusations. In a major turning point, a judge dismissed Baldoni’s countersuit on June 9, 2025, a legal victory that appeared to validate Lively’s position. With a trial date set for March 9, 2026, the pre-trial discovery phase is in full swing, a period where both sides gather evidence to build their cases. It is within this intense, high-stakes process that the alleged attempt to subpoena Megyn Kelly took place, highlighting the aggressive tactics being deployed in this bitter Hollywood drama.

A Firm Denial From Team Lively

In a move that complicates the narrative, a spokesperson for Blake Lively issued a statement flatly denying Kelly’s core claim. “At no point in this litigation has Ms. Lively served a subpoena on Megyn Kelly,” the representative told TheWrap. This statement directly contradicts Kelly’s entire account, transforming the situation into a contentious war of words.

Lively’s camp framed their legal activities not as harassment, but as a legitimate and necessary part of the discovery process to prove their allegations of retaliation by Baldoni’s team. “[Ms. Lively] is continuing to pursue discovery in order to prove her case that Justin Baldoni, Jed Wallace, Melissa Nathan and the Wayfarer Parties’ retaliated against her for speaking up,” the spokesperson said. By their account, their actions are standard legal procedure aimed at uncovering evidence of an orchestrated campaign against Lively, rather than an attack on the press. This denial presents a starkly different reality, suggesting Kelly either misinterpreted or exaggerated the legal maneuverings for the benefit of her audience.

Collateral Damage: Ryan Reynolds Enters the Fray

In her on-air critique, Kelly did not limit her scorn to Blake Lively. She also took a direct shot at Lively’s husband, actor Ryan Reynolds, implicating him in what she portrayed as a pattern of behavior by a powerful Hollywood couple. “These two Hollywood mega millionaires think nothing of harassing powerless people on social media who have the temerity to write or speak negatively about Queen Blake,” Kelly stated.

She then issued a warning to her audience about Reynolds’ carefully cultivated public image. “Remember that the next time you see Ryan Reynolds trying to pawn himself off as the nice guy… he’s a bully, too.” This expansion of the conflict to include Reynolds adds another layer of celebrity firepower to the feud. It serves as a reminder that in high-profile disputes, spouses and family members are often pulled into the public narrative, whether they are directly involved or not. Kelly’s comment was a calculated move to reframe the public’s perception of one of Hollywood’s most beloved couples.

Conclusion: An Unresolved Clash of Titans

The explosive saga of the Megyn Kelly Blake Lively subpoena has created a fascinating and unresolved standoff. On one side stands Megyn Kelly, portraying her fight as a righteous defense of freedom of the press against the arrogant overreach of an out-of-touch celebrity. On the other stands Blake Lively, whose representatives deny the central accusation and paint a picture of a woman simply using the legal system to defend herself against a coordinated attack. With flat denials and passionate accusations, the truth remains buried under layers of legal strategy and public relations. This battle of narratives has become a spectacle in its own right, a high-stakes drama playing out in the court of public opinion. As the world watches, the reputations of three major stars hang in the balance, with the final act yet to be written.